fbpx

Regular Plan or Direct Plan: Mutual Funds

Direct vs regula mutual funds by Nexgenlife solutions

Mutual Funds: Direct vs. Regular Plans – Which Option Suits You Better?
While investing in mutual funds, one of the primary choices you face as an investor is between going
for a Direct Plan or a Regular Plan.
Both options give you access to the same mutual fund schemes and underlying assets, but there are
a few key differences in the way they are managed and the fees associated with each.
What is a Direct Plan?
A Direct Plan in mutual funds is one where investors invest directly with the mutual fund company,
without involving any intermediaries, such as brokers or distributors.

Launched in 2013 by SEBI (Securities and Exchange Board of India), Direct Plans enable investors to
avoid the commission fees associated with intermediaries, resulting in lower expense ratios.
Key Features:

  • No Distributor Commissions: Direct Plans eliminate distributor commissions, leading to lower
    expense ratios.
  • Higher NAV: Lower expenses mean that Direct Plans typically have a slightly higher NAV (Net Asset
    Value) than Regular Plans.
  • DIY Approach: Investors need to manage investments on their own, without intermediary
    guidance.
    Who Should Consider It?
    Direct Plans are ideal for experienced investors or those who are comfortable making their own
    investment decisions, as well as those looking to maximize returns over the long term by minimizing
    costs.
    What is a Regular Plan?
    A Regular Plan, on the other hand, is purchased through a broker, distributor, or financial advisor.
    Since there is an intermediary involved, there are additional fees for their services, which are
    included in the fund’s expense ratio.
    The higher expense ratio slightly reduces returns, but investors benefit from the advice and support
    offered by these intermediaries.
    Why do you need advice and support?
    You need advice and support mainly because:
     You need to maximize your returns
     You need to maximise your returns in the least risky way
     You need to know in which fund to invest and when

Key Features:

  • Higher Expense Ratio: Regular Plans include distributor commissions, leading to a higher expense
    ratio.
  • Lower NAV: Due to the higher expense ratio, the NAV of Regular Plans is usually slightly lower than
    that of Direct Plans.
  • Advisor Support: Investors receive guidance, making Regular Plans ideal for those who want help in
    selecting and managing funds.
    Who Should Consider It?
    Regular Plans are suitable for new investors or those who prefer to have professional assistance with
    their investment decisions, as well as individuals who value having an advisor to guide them through
    market changes.
    Comparison of Direct and Regular Plans
    Type Feature
    Regular
     Lower expense
    ratio
     NAV higher
     Advisory
    support
     Ideal for
    experienced
    advisors
     Potentially
    slightly more
    returns
    Direct  Higher
    expense ratio
     NAV lower
     No advisory
    support
     Ideal for
    skilled investors
     Potentially
    slightly lower
    returns.
    Advantages and Disadvantages
    Direct Plan
    Advantages:
  • Lower expense ratio, resulting in potentially higher returns over time.
  • Direct control over investments, appealing to experienced investors.
    Disadvantages:
  • No advisory support, which may be challenging for beginners.
  • Requires knowledge and confidence to select and manage funds independently.
    Regular Plan
    Advantages:
  • Access to advisory support, which can be beneficial for new investors or those with limited time to
    manage investments.
  • Easier process, as advisors assist with fund selection and provide guidance based on market trends.
    Disadvantages:
  • Higher expense ratio due to distributor commissions, slightly reducing overall returns.
  • Investors may become dependent on advisors, potentially affecting their ability to make
    independent investment decisions.
    Impact of Expense Ratios on Returns: A Data-Driven Example
    For a clearer perspective, let’s look at the long-term impact of expense ratios on returns for both
    Direct and Regular Plans:
    Example: Assume an investment of INR 1 lakh in a mutual fund with an average return of 12%
    annually.

Plan Type Expense ratio 10-year corpus (lakh) 20-year corpus (lakh)
Direct 1% 3.12 9.65
Regular 1% 3.01 8.91
The difference may seem small initially, but over long periods, even a slight reduction in the expense
ratio has a compounding effect, allowing Direct Plans to outperform Regular Plans by a significant
margin.
Tax Implications
The tax data on mutual funds for 2024 reflects significant changes brought by the latest Union
Budget in India:

  1. Equity Mutual Funds:
    o Short-Term Capital Gains (STCG): Now taxed at 20% for holdings of less than one
    year, up from the previous 15%.
    o Long-Term Capital Gains (LTCG): Now taxed at 12.5% if held for more than a year, an
    increase from the former 10% rate on gains exceeding INR 1 lakh. This could impact
    the attractiveness of equity funds for long-term growth investors.
  2. Debt Mutual Funds:
    o Debt funds that do not hold at least 35% in equities are treated as short-term assets
    for tax purposes, regardless of holding period. Gains on these funds are taxed at the
    investor’s income tax slab rate, without the indexation benefits previously available,
    potentially making them less appealing for long-term debt investors.
  3. Funds of Funds (FoFs):
    o Taxation for FoFs and international mutual funds now includes 20% on short-term
    gains (holding period less than two years) and 12.5% on long-term gains (holding

period over two years). This aligns the tax structure more closely with equity funds,
providing potential tax savings for investors with a longer holding period.
These changes are intended to simplify tax calculations but may require investors to adjust
strategies, especially those relying on tax efficiency in equity or debt mutual funds.
Which is Better: Direct or Regular?
The choice between a Direct and Regular Plan comes down to your investment experience and the
level of guidance you require.

  • Direct Plan: If you are a knowledgeable investor who prefers to handle your portfolio personally
    and maximize returns, Direct Plans offer the advantage of lower costs, which, compounded over
    time, can lead to meaningful gains.
  • Regular Plan: If you are new to investing or prefer having an advisor’s support, Regular Plans might
    be a better fit. The additional costs associated with Regular Plans can be worthwhile if you rely on
    expert guidance to navigate complex market conditions.
    Conclusion
    Both Direct and Regular Plans offer distinct advantages, but for long-term investors looking to
    maximize returns, Direct Plans generally emerge as the better choice.
    With a lower expense ratio, Direct Plans allow your money to grow more efficiently over time.
    For investors who are comfortable managing their own portfolios and don’t need regular guidance,
    the cost-saving benefits make Direct Plans highly attractive.
    However, if you value professional assistance and want ongoing support, the Regular Plan can be a
    sensible choice.
    Paying slightly higher fees for the advice and help of an advisor can be especially beneficial for those
    who are new to mutual funds or uncertain about choosing the right funds.
    Ultimately, understanding your own comfort level with investing and your need for guidance will
    help you make a more confident and well-aligned choice.